Stemica Labs

rating tier average

brand rating & evaluation

Stemica Labs

brand rating & evaluation
overall rating: Average
rating tier average

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (Avoid) to 5 (Top Choice).

See how we rate.


The Shifting Gaia rating evaluates brands based on sustainable practices, ingredients and materials, and social responsibility, among others. Below are a few factors influencing this brand's score:

overview

sustainability
2.6 out of 10
non-toxic
7.0 out of 10
social responsibility

about

Stemica Labs is a Lebanon-based skincare and haircare brand that formulates “advanced cosmetics” using stem cell science and clinically active ingredients.

sustainability

Rotating arrow
Sustainability
score:
2.6 out of 10

details:

Packaging

The brand’s packaging is predominantly virgin plastic, with sleek cosmetic jars and bottles. There is no evidence of recycled content, recyclability instructions, or refill systems.Without any PCR (post-consumer recycled) content, compostable materials, or design for easy recyclability, Stemica’s packaging falls short of sustainable standards. 

Ingredient Sustainability

Stemica Labs’ formulations incorporate a mix of lab-synthesized actives and plant-based ingredients that are generally more sustainable than petrochemical alternatives.

The brand confirms it “uses a blend of high-quality plant-based ingredients and scientifically selected actives,” explicitly avoiding problematic inputs like sulfates and parabens. This indicates a preference for renewable, biodegradable materials: botanical oils and extracts (pumpkin seed oil, caffeine from coffee, etc.) are renewable resources, and lab-grown peptides or stem cell secretomes can be produced without agricultural land use. 

The brand does not detail sourcing for its botanical ingredients (e.g. whether plant extracts are organic or fair trade) and holds no certifications.

Energy & Carbon Footprint

Stemica Labs provides no sustainability report or data on its manufacturing energy sources, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, or climate initiatives. Their FAQ notes products are made in Lebanon in a modern facility, but there is no mention of using renewable energy (solar, etc.) or efforts to improve energy efficiency. Given Lebanon’s grid relies heavily on fossil fuels and diesel generators, it’s likely the production and distribution currently have a significant carbon footprint that is unmitigated.

Waste Management

There is no public information on how the brand handles factory waste, chemical runoff, or whether it implements recycling in production. Packaging waste is a concern, as discussed – the products come in non-refillable plastic containers, and Stemica offers no take-back or recycling program for empties. 

Business Model

Stemica Labs operates on a traditional beauty business model that leans toward encouraging regular consumption of its products.

Bundles like “The Stem Cell Daily System” are sold to promote buying an entire set for a comprehensive routines. This indicates a cross-selling strategy typical of the skincare industry – not overtly wasteful, but aimed at higher consumption per customer (using several specialized items rather than a single multi-use product).

non-toxic

Rotating arrow
Non-toxic
score:
7.0 out of 10

details:

Stemica Labs achieves a generally non-toxic formulation profile, emphasizing safety for both users and the environment.

No parabens or hormone-disrupting preservatives are used. Instead, the products likely rely on safer preservative systems (not listed in highlights, but presumably phenoxyethanol or plant-based preservatives given the claims). The absence of synthetic fragrance is significant: fragrance compounds in cosmetics are a frequent source of allergens and potential toxins; Stemica avoiding them means it also avoids undisclosed phthalates or musks often present in fragrances.

In place of such ingredients, Stemica uses well-studied actives like niacinamide, vitamin C, lactic acid, caffeine, and retinol. All of which have strong safety profiles for topical use when formulated correctly. The peptides and growth factors are lab-designed to mimic natural human cell signals and are not known to be toxic; they stay mostly in the skin’s surface layers and degrade naturally. Botanical extracts (e.g. pumpkin seed, horse chestnut) are generally safe, with low risk profiles and long histories of traditional use. The inclusion of soothing agents like allantoin in multiple formulas further suggests the brand formulates to minimize irritation.

A few potent actives do appear. For example, Retinol (Vitamin A) in the Night Cream and Aminexil in the Hair Regrowth Solution Retinol can cause skin sensitivity (and is contraindicated in pregnancy), and Aminexil is a drug-derived ingredient (a vasodilator for hair loss). However, these are not “toxic” in the carcinogenic or endocrine sense; rather, they require responsible use.

social responsibility

Rotating arrow
Social responsibility
score:

details:

Fair Labor

Stemica Labs provides minimal insight into its labor practices and supply chain ethics, placing it in a low tier for fair labor by default. Production is done in-house or locally: “manufactured in a state-of-the-art facility in Lebanon.” This suggests the company directly oversees its manufacturing workforce, rather than outsourcing to unknown factories. 

Animal Welfare

Stemica Labs performs strongly in animal welfare criteria, with a fully cruelty-free and vegan-friendly product line. Their actives are synthetic or plant-based (e.g. plant stem cell secretome, botanical extracts, vitamins). Unlike some skincare brands, Stemica does not use common animal by-products like collagen, keratin, beeswax, or carmine.

Stemica has not announced a formal cruelty-free certification (such as Leaping Bunny or PETA), but given that animal testing for cosmetics is banned in its primary market and it makes vegan claims, it is reasonable to conclude no animal testing is conducted or commissioned. 

Community Engagement

In the realm of community and social impact, Stemica Labs shows little to no engagement beyond its business operations. The brand’s communications center on product efficacy and science; there are no mentions of charitable partnerships, community programs, or environmental initiatives benefiting society at large. Because the brand’s focus is narrow (selling products) and it has not demonstrated broader corporate social responsibility in the community context, it falls into a low tier here.