Brand Rating:

YSL Beauty

Name: Shifting Gaia brand review: YSL Beauty
Item: YSL Beauty
Rating: 2
Author: Shifting Gaia

Poor

4/10

Score 4/10

The Shifting Gaia rating evaluates brands based on sustainable practices, ingredients and materials, and social responsibility, among others. Below are a few factors influencing this brand's score:

Certifications

Cradle to Cradle

RSP

RSPO Certified

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (Avoid) to 5 (Top Choice).
See how we rate.

Rated: July 24, 2026
Category: Beauty care
Subcategory: Makeup

Overview:

Sustainability 5.9/10

Non-toxicity 4.0/10

YSL Beauty is the makeup, skincare, and fragrance house of Yves Saint Laurent, operated under the luxury division of L’Oréal. It develops prestige cosmetics, perfumes, and skincare sold worldwide.

Highlights

Refillable hero fragrances and skincare
Climate targets validated by the Science Based Targets initiative

Sustainability

score : 5.9/10

Packaging

YSL Beauty has made refill systems a centerpiece of its packaging strategy, and this is the strongest part of its environmental footprint at the shelf. Its most recognizable fragrances, including Libre, Y, and MYSLF, have been re-engineered to accept large refills, and the brand reports cutting glass, metal, and plastic use substantially when a refill replaces repeat full-price bottles.

Refillable formats now extend across skincare icons such as the Or Rouge cream and several Pure Shots serums, with the brand citing material reductions of up to 92 percent on some refill pods.

Lipstick bullets, mascaras, cushion compacts, and fragrance caps still rely on mixed plastics, metals, and magnetic closures that are difficult to separate and recycle, and heavyweight secondary packaging persists across gifting and holiday sets. Compostable or bio-based materials remain marginal, post-consumer recycled content is partial rather than standard, and the inks and coatings used are not third-party verified.

Ingredient Sustainability

On the plant-derived side, YSL Beauty has built one of the more credible sourcing stories in prestige beauty. Its Ourika Community Gardens in the Moroccan Atlas grow and hand-harvest signature botanicals such as pomegranate, marshmallow, walnut, iris, jasmine, and saffron using organic practices, and the Rewild Our Earth program commits to protecting and restoring land across Morocco, Madagascar, Haiti, and Indonesia where the brand sources material.

This matters because several of the botanicals in the range are inherently demanding. Saffron, jasmine, and iris are among the most resource-intensive plant ingredients in cosmetics; geranium, which the brand links to Madagascar, is associated with soil and water pressure under monoculture; and shea butter, which appears in the Pure Shots cream, carries overharvesting risk when demand outpaces tree regeneration. Cultivating these in managed, biodiversity-focused systems rather than wild-harvesting them is the right approach and lifts the sustainability profile of the botanical fraction. Mica, used for shimmer in the makeup, remains a watch-item.

The limiting factor is the formulation base itself, which is heavily synthetic and petroleum-derived. Across the sample we found pervasive silicones and, most significantly for the environment, plastic-class polymers such as polyethylene, nylon-12, and styrene/acrylates copolymer that contribute to microplastic pollution and do not biodegrade. L’Oréal’s group-level commitment to reach 95 percent bio-based, mineral-derived, or circular ingredients by 2030 is a strong directional signal, and the brand’s botanical sourcing is transparent and well-documented, but the current formulas still lean on a substantial unsustainable-synthetic load.

Energy Use and Carbon Footprint

Carbon and energy are the brand’s strongest area, carried by L’Oréal’s group infrastructure. The parent’s decarbonization trajectory was validated by the Science Based Targets initiative in 2024, with a commitment to a major absolute reduction in emissions across all scopes by 2030 and net zero by 2050.

The overwhelming majority of L’Oréal’s industrial sites now run on renewable electricity, with the company reporting figures in the high-seventies to high-nineties percent range and a roughly 74 percent cut in industrial emissions, and YSL’s French production sites are reported as carbon neutral.

The group favors sea freight over air, runs life-cycle analysis on products through its internal SPOT tool, and reports to the CDP.

However, L’Oréal’s total footprint has grown rather than shrunk in recent years, largely because of acquisitions, and the hardest emissions sit in the value chain (raw materials, consumer use, and transport) rather than in the factories where the renewable-energy wins are concentrated.

Waste Management

The same refill architecture that helps the packaging score is the main driver here, and refills are weighted heavily in any serious circularity assessment.

By making its fragrance and skincare icons refillable rather than offering refills as a token option, the brand reduces repeat packaging waste at scale, and the TerraCycle partnership adds an end-of-life recovery route for empties. Removing leaflets and redesigning components to use less material are further resource-efficiency gains.

What holds it back from the highest tier is the absence of broader circular practices. There is no buyback scheme, little use of upcycled or repurposed ingredients, and refills do not yet extend comprehensively across the makeup lines.

Business Model

YSL Beauty operates a classic prestige-beauty model built on frequent launches and an active promotional calendar. New fragrance flankers, seasonal and holiday makeup collections, limited editions, and trend-led shades arrive regularly, and the brand leans on gift-with-purchase offers, retailer events, and sale periods that encourage repeat and impulse purchasing. These are structural drivers of consumption rather than restraint.

Non-toxicity

score : 4.0/10

The brand sits in the middle of the field. On the positive side, transparency is reasonable: full ingredient lists are published, and YSL discloses around 95 percent of its fragrance formulas, which is better than most perfume houses.

Skincare formulas draw heavily on well-tolerated, low-risk actives such as glycerin, niacinamide, hyaluronic acid, panthenol, and vitamin E, and many newer launches have moved away from parabens toward gentler preservative systems built on phenoxyethanol and caprylyl glycol.

The drawbacks are concentrated in makeup, fragrance, and sun care. Across the sample we found a meaningful load of moderately concerning ingredients: chemical UV filters including homosalate, octocrylene, and octinoxate that are associated with hormone-system concerns; the antioxidant BHT; mineral oil and talc in legacy formulas; synthetic colorants such as Red 4.

The formulations are compliant with strict EU cosmetic regulations and carry no human-health certifications such as EWG Verified or MADE SAFE, and on balance they meet baseline safety expectations without going meaningfully beyond them.

Social Responsibility

score : 5.0/10

Fair Labor

Labor practices are assessed largely at the L’Oréal group level, since that is where YSL Beauty’s manufacturing and sourcing sit, and they are robust. The group has committed to paying its own employees a living wage, working with the Fair Wage Network to benchmark it, and has extended that commitment to the employees of its strategic suppliers by 2030. It became a participating company of the Fair Labor Association in 2024 and is pursuing agricultural accreditation for its coconut sourcing.

Its social-audit program is extensive, running on the order of a thousand or more supplier audits a year, with dozens of industrial sites undergoing external human-rights audits and a “Speak Up” whistleblowing channel open to workers across the value chain. Inclusive-sourcing programs reported benefiting more than a hundred thousand people in 2024, and the group operates under the French Duty of Care law with detailed public reporting.

Residual risk remains in a supply chain this large and complex, particularly in higher-risk agricultural inputs such as mica, palm, and coconut, and the strength of the policy sits at the parent level rather than being specific to the YSL brand.

Community Engagement

The brand’s flagship social program, Abuse Is Not Love, is a substantive and well-aligned commitment rather than a token campaign. Launched in 2020 to combat intimate partner violence, it works with non-profit partners across more than twenty countries, funds academic research, trains its own staff and beauty advisors, and has set a measurable target of educating two million people on the warning signs of abuse by 2030, with hundreds of thousands reached so far. The cause aligns closely with a brand whose customer base is predominantly women, which gives the work credibility and staying power.

Animal Welfare

YSL Beauty is not certified cruelty-free by Leaping Bunny or PETA, and it sells in mainland China, where imported cosmetics can still be subject to animal testing under certain conditions. Its parent, L’Oréal, is likewise not a cruelty-free company. The brand also uses animal-derived ingredients such as beeswax and carmine in parts of its makeup range, so its products are not vegan.